KI und WordPress WP Meetup Hamburg #140

Chapter 12

So what does that mean for us?

The uncomfortable question is not whether the AI can do our work.

  • Eight hours against one — the client sees the result, not the road.
  • If building becomes cheap, what is actually being paid for?
  • Probably for what comes after: liability, maintenance, handover, structure.
  • Not learning every tool. But understanding what each one does to you.
  • Knowing how things go wrong over years is not something you can prompt.

Is the website still our product — or by now the easiest part of it?

What it costs — and what it hangs on

Everyone talks about speed. Almost nobody talks about the invoice and the dependency, and those decide whether this still holds in three years.

  • The price is known today, not tomorrow

    I pay around 200 euros a month for the subscription I work with. For me that pays off easily. But I have no contract saying it will still do so next year: prices rise, plans get restructured, quotas get cut. Anyone basing their costing on it is costing on somebody else's ground.

  • The model under you gets swapped

    What works reliably today can behave differently after a model change. That is why my knowledge lives in a system rather than in a chat history — a system survives the swap, a conversation does not. It is also the answer to "which AI should I use": the less that answer matters, the better off you are.

  • And it hangs on your machine

    Tools, credentials and configuration sit locally. If the disk dies, it is all gone for a while. So: backups — and not only of the website, but of what you built yourself. Precisely the part nobody thinks of, because it looks like tooling rather than work.

  • Without guardrails an AI takes a site apart

    Write access plus one misread instruction is a deleted post type. Test system, its own user, few permissions, a backup first. That is not distrust — it is the same reflex as before a big plugin update.